I am increasingly struck by the number of places where one is greeted with signs saying that abuse of staff will not be tolerated. Train stations, GP surgeries, hospital waiting rooms and airport security checkpoints all have these signs on the wall. Why? Because they provide third-rate levels of service and we, the paying public, get angry and upset at the moronic levels of service provided to us by the unionised staff who know their rights but have no concept whatsoever of customer service. If we were served properly there would be less need for these signs.
We are entitled as consumers to be served properly. And while these staff are entitled not to be violently assaulted, I dispute that they are entitled to refuse to serve people who, in their understandable anger, use choice language towards them. It's unpleasant but it's a long way from being punched by an angry customer. From personal experience I consider that it is usually the "customer service agent" who is in the wrong, not the customer. The customer, after all, is always right - or at least is in a free-market context.

